High Stakes Adventures - Greed on the river

High Stakes Adventures - Greed on the river
Wednesday, 1 September 2010

By Sami "LarsLuzak" Kelopuro


Early this year I played a heads up session with URnotINDanger2 on Full Tilt Poker. We were 4-tabling $100/$200 NLHE. The session lasted for a few hours and it was really bad for me, I lost approximately $130,000. As my opponent told me in the chat, he was running extremely well. Setups, suckouts, as sometimes happens. Here I will talk about the biggest pot in the session, one that I could have played better.

I open from the button for $600 with 6h4h. URnotINdanger2 calls. The flop comes Qc3d2h. He checks, I c-bet $800 and he raises to $2,800. This is a spot where he will often try to steal the pot from me. I c-bet most flops, and this is a dry flop that doesn't hit my hand very often. At this point all my options are open: I can fold my lousy gutshot, I can call in the hope that my hand improves or he gives up on the turn, or I can re-raise to find out what he's up to.


We are deep-stacked, so I decide to re-raise to $6,400. There's no point in raising more because if he's going to call me he will call a bigger raise, too, and a smaller raise leaves me more room to manoeuvre on later streets. Also, I don't think he's 4-betting me with any hand here. There's no flush draw on the flop, so I assume he's slow-playing all of his good hands in this spot. He makes the call.


Besides a gutshot, I also have a backdoor flush draw. If my hand doesn't improve on the turn, I will probably take a free card and give up if I don't hit my hand. His call on the flop is an indication of a very good hand, so I don't think I have much fold equity here.


Turn is the five of spades, the best possible card for me. He checks, and I bet $8,888 into a pot of $14,000. It's a good sized bet, but there's no point in giving him a discount here. If all he has is a queen, betting small does not make him call more often and he will probably fold anyway, whereas if he has two pair, a set or a straight, he will call or raise.
He makes the call. The river is a deuce, and he checks. The pot is $31,766, he has $23,202 behind and I have slightly more.


This river is bad for me because now there are not many worse hands that call me. I believe he often has a set that just rivered a full house and sometimes even quads. I'm thinking about checking the river. It would be an easier decision if he had less or more behind. If he had less, say $10,000, it would be an automatic value bet for me. If he had way more than the pot behind, it would be an automatic check because I don't want to face a big raise. I don't want to use my time-bank to give him any extra reads. I think for about 15 seconds and decide that checking behind is too weak.


Sure, it's possible that he might call me with just a queen of even some worse hands if he thinks I'm bluffing. However, I think he would have folded a queen on the turn so there are not many hands that call me here. A-4 is possible but not very likely. I don't know if he would ever play a hand like Q-5 suited or Q-3 suited on the big blind. Those hands might make the call since they have blockers to a full house and it's not easy for him to put me on a straight because then I only had a gutshot on the flop. And since he just called me pre-flop, he doesn't have Q-Q here. I don't believe he has a hand like A-Q, K-Q or Q-J, and if he did, he might have 3-bet with them pre-flop. And as I said before, I don't think he's calling with those hands on the turn as all they are beating is a bluff and he will often be drawing dead with one pair.


So that leaves 3-3 and 2-2, a full house or quads. If I check behind on the river, I believe I will often win the pot, but since I don't think there's many worse hands that call me, there's really no point in betting.
But my greed gets the better of me, and I go all-in. He calls me in a flash and I know I have lost the hand even before I see his 2-2 for quads.
I'm still not quite sure whether I played the hand correctly or not, but checking behind on the river should be a strong option here. To make a thin value bet, you need enough worse hands that call.


Good players know how to make tight folds in spots where a bluff is not very likely. If you're up against a bad player or a calling station, you have to punish them often, but a good thinking player doesn't just hand over his money to you.


A similar situation in Omaha might be the second nut straight or a small full house on the river in a small pot when you're opponent makes a small value bet and you know you beat him most of the time. Even if you do have the best hand in most cases, there is always a chance that he has a better one. Even if he is value-betting a moderately good hand, he won't call your raise with the second best hand.
Bookmark and Share AddThis Feed Button
TAGS: Poker News, High, Stakes, Adventures, -, Greed, on, the, river
Genting Poker Series

Alan Fox heads Genting Poker Series Day 1A

118 players buy into the first opening flight with Barny Boatman, Joe Beevers and Mickey Wernick among those making it through to Day 2.

» Genting Poker Series Main Event starts today

Americas Card Room

americascardroom logo Rating

Americascardroom.eu recently merged with the ever-popular DoyleRoom.net and fans of that site can expect all their favourite features to remain intact. Furthermore, it’s an expansion that enables greater liquidity, and therefore a wider choice of games and even bigger and better promos.

Read More Play now

Paddy Power Poker

PaddyPower Poker Rating
Read More Play now

Betfair Poker

Betfair Poker Rating
Read More Play now

William Hill

William Hill Rating
Read More Play now

CardGang

Rank Player Points
1 Martin Jacobson 19977
2 Hugo Lemaire 17887
3 John Eames 16620
4 Alexander Dovzhenko 15518
Read More