Nik Persaud answers your questions!!! |
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Author | |
Editor
Bluff Europe Beginner
Bluff Europe Editor Joined: 24 Oct 2008 Location: Bluff Towers Posts: 7 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Nik Persaud answers your questions!!!Posted: 03 Feb 2009 at 4:32pm |
|
Nik Persaud will be popping in to answer your questions over the next few days. Now's your chance to get some valuable advice from a top UK pro! Post your questions here...
Edited by Administrator - 04 Feb 2009 at 12:16pm |
|
![]() |
|
elway7
Bluff Europe Groupie
Bluff Europe Online Editor Joined: 02 Feb 2009 Posts: 58 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Feb 2009 at 8:54pm |
|
I think I read somewhere that you were in the process of putting together a poker training site like Stox Poker and Card Runners. Could you tell us a bit more about this (who have you got lines up to coach?) and what will make it different from the US sites?
|
|
![]() |
|
Nik Persaud
Bluff Europe Beginner
Joined: 04 Feb 2009 Location: Londinium Posts: 10 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Feb 2009 at 5:40pm |
|
Hi Elway7,
Yes you're right, Neil Channing, myself (et al) are soon to be launching a site that will be a bit more of a 'facebook meets training site' type of application called Blackbeltpoker.
Personally, I have always used twoplustwo as a way of improving my game, and more recently have subscribed to cardrunners and deucescracked.
I feel that these sites have really increased the knowledge within the game, and I have certainly noticed the games online getting a lot tougher within the last year.
Neil and I felt that 1 small drawback of these sites is that they are very much US based and whilst excellent, lack a community feel for the UK and Europe. Hence, we wanted to deliver something a bit more 'homegrown'.
So initially, we are just building a platform to get everyone together, having fun and talking, then leverage that to identify the training needs of our members. Different people have different reasons why they play poker (most recreational, some professional), for example:
1) To give new players to the game a lively, fun environment where they learn and discuss the basics with others at their own level. We will also host 'live sessions' where they can meet (us) and play before venturing to casinos and larger live tournaments.
2) Another player might work full-time (been playing a year or so) and might want to qualify for 2/3 GUKPT's a year. Again, we would like to help them to help achieve these goals and give them the path to do so.
3) Now we get to the more 'serious' player. This might be someone that plays a lot online in low/mid stakes games and is looking to increase their win rate significantly. We will not only help by the traditional 'video' lessons route, but also looking at coaching from higher stakes players/members. I also feel that this player would be helped from improving their home set-up and looking at all of the software that is available.
4) Lastly, I would also like to build a community for the serious UK/Euro professional player. Here idea sharing, strategy, and all the things that going into winning long-term in the game can be discussed. Also, ideas like staking other players, bankroll management, and tilt manegement can be discussed.
The above are just some of the ideas that we are currently discussing and correct implementation of these ideas is the key. Neil has good relationships with a lot of the professionals in the UK community and we are currently talking with those that may like to be involved. As a example, I think that my PLO game would improve if a series could be done by messrs Ashby and Grundy.
I hope that this answers some of your questions about our forthcoming project. I don't know exactly how the game is going to evolve in the next 18 months, but I would personally like to keep in touch as effectively as possible. Maybe Blackbeltpoker can be one way in which we can all do so.
Nik.
|
|
![]() |
|
tilty
Bluff Europe Beginner
Joined: 02 Feb 2009 Location: London Posts: 4 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Feb 2009 at 10:07pm |
|
Hey Nick,
I've been playing a lot of multi-table tournaments recently (haven't we all!). It seems like the last few times I've been knocked out in small blind / big blind situations (usually with me in the small blind with holdings like A-J, 8-8, etc., and not believing my opponent has anything. Do you have any good general advice for SM v BB tournament situations? It's really hard to find any literature out there on the subject. Well done at the GUKPT last year by the way. Hope you knock 'em dead this year. |
|
![]() |
|
Nik Persaud
Bluff Europe Beginner
Joined: 04 Feb 2009 Location: Londinium Posts: 10 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Feb 2009 at 11:23pm |
|
Hi Tilty, I agree with you that playing from the blinds (esp the SB), is really tough and will always lead to
tournament exits for all players from beginner to expert so don't be too disheartened. A lot depends who you have in the BB, and an aggressive player can simply be a nightmare (someone that likes to re-reraise our preflop raises, defend light and float post-flop). Playing from the SB, you will always be playing OOP and it's just so hard to make good decisions and play profitably from there. That said, here's some general tactics that I employ:
Early in an MTT (with around 100BB effective stacks), I tend just to play quite passively and get a feel for how the BB responds. I am not looking to create big pots out of postion. Stealing the blinds is not quite as vital at this stage. That said, if I think the BB is playing too tightly or weakly I may raise my top 50% of hands every time it's folded to me and c bet the flop. When the MTT develops into the mid stages and the antes kick in, this is when becomes trickier like
when you have 35-60BB effective stacks. Completing in the small blind offers great immediate odds to call because of the antes, so calling here with a WIDE range isn't terrible. However, it does have one pitfall which is 'reverse implied odds'. That is to say that if you limp in with a hand like Q8, you may have kicker trouble if you flop top pair and may have trouble getting away from your hand (with that stack sizes being what they are). So maybe check calling the flop (as only a King or Ace is bad for you hand and he may have raised your limp preflop with those) might be a good defensive tactic. When the MTT is late on, and the effective stacks can be anything from 10-30BB then it's really just
preflop poker. with like <15BB I am often just open shoving 95% my hands preflop to win what's in there already (as it's so much, and not often folded to you). With the top end of those BB (like 30), I may opt to limp reraise allin sometimes, or still raise/fold if I have total garbage. You mentioned hands like AJ and 88. Late on (<30BB) these hands are too strong not play aggressively.
Raise/CALL all in (along with your very strong hands) is always going to be the best play. Like, I said before, just tread carefully with these hands (esp 88 on K 2 3 boards) when you are a bit deeper stacked. Lastly, don't worry about your outcomes/results when you hit a bad run for a bit. These are a short
sample of MTT's and good play will show a profit in the end. There is no easy answer in the blinds as soooo much depends who you are up against and how THEY play. I hope this helps and thanks for kind words too.
Nik. Edited by Nik Persaud - 04 Feb 2009 at 11:35pm |
|
![]() |
|
elway7
Bluff Europe Groupie
Bluff Europe Online Editor Joined: 02 Feb 2009 Posts: 58 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Feb 2009 at 5:15pm |
|
I mostly play sit n go's but would like to dip my toe into the cash game waters. What basic strategy changes would I need to make moving from one type of game to the other?
Thanks |
|
![]() |
|
LolKitteh
Bluff Europe Groupie
Joined: 20 Oct 2008 Posts: 47 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Feb 2009 at 11:44pm |
|
Nik,
first, thanks for dropping by. How was it when you first started playing, did you play very low stakes then went up? did you quickly try to go up in stakes? Were you fearless with your money? |
|
![]() |
|
LolKitteh
Bluff Europe Groupie
Joined: 20 Oct 2008 Posts: 47 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Feb 2009 at 11:46pm |
|
Nik, was there a time in your life when you were losing at poker? and if yes, what was your attitude at the time, did you listen to friends' advice, study the game,...
|
|
![]() |
|
Nik Persaud
Bluff Europe Beginner
Joined: 04 Feb 2009 Location: Londinium Posts: 10 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Feb 2009 at 5:58pm |
|
Hi Elway7, Sorry that you have taken me a few days to reply, but I have been a bit tied up with the European
Open. (Un)Luckily, my first round exit will allow me more time to answer questions... The key difference between a sit and go and cash games will be your stack size. In a typical sit and
go, you will start with 1500 chips and starting blinds will be 10/20. This is really the only point in a sng where you will be adopting a similar strategy to a cash game (positional awareness, starting hand selection, and playing through the streets). As you are well aware as the sng progresses, aggression and pushing your preflop edge (as
well as adjusting your calling range when others push all in) in the key to being successful. Understanding your equity in the sng and the 'worth' of your chips underpins how these games are played. A cash game requires different skill-sets as it is more complex post-flop and the blinds are static. Most of your profit in a cash game will occur in situations after the flop. Advice that I would give someone making the transition would be to look at starting hand selection. Some hands that are useful (to push all in with) in the late stages of a sng (KJ and A8 for example) have the potential to cause real dangers in cash games (reverse implied odds). This is due to the 'deep' stack sizes that are in play (100BB+).
Conversely, hands like suited connectors have much more value in a cash game as they have the
potential to win big pots against opponents that might have (big) one pair type hands (implied odds). Having these hands in position is valuable and can prove very proftable under the right circumstances. The same can be said for small/medium pairs. These hands can flop sets and win big pots in cash games. They are quite straightfoward to play, as if your 22 does not improve on the flop, you should normally fold. You can profitably 'set-mine' for 5% of your effective stack to beat a big pair and up to 10% under the right circumstances. Therefore, with all this said, it is important for YOU not to overplay you big pair hands obviously.
As a rule of thumb, if you have greater that ten times the pot in your stack, and you have TPTK or an overpair, be weary of an opponent trying to get all in with you. If you have a small Stack-to-pot- ratio (SPR) like 5, then you can comfortably get all in as your hand will be good so often. range in early seats and avoid 'trouble' hands (like KJ), and try to come in with a raise if you are first in the pot with a hand that you want to play. Raising and having the pre-flop 'initiative' will allow you win pots post-flop and force your opponents to make THEIR hand. Many pots will be won with a continuation bet. In late postion, you can make up for your (early position) tight/passive approach by raising more and more hands, and use your postion and aggression to create difficult decisions for your opponents (and more profitable ones for you). To be honest elway7, there are many more areas that I could go into with some detail, but hand
selection and position are two KEY areas that provide a good starting point. Let me know your thoughts on these areas and the situations that you find, and then maybe we can expand on this. Nik.
Edited by Nik Persaud - 10 Feb 2009 at 6:05pm |
|
![]() |
|
Nik Persaud
Bluff Europe Beginner
Joined: 04 Feb 2009 Location: Londinium Posts: 10 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Feb 2009 at 6:28pm |
|
Hi Lolkitteh, Good question. Thinking about this exact point has really helped me think about my own poker career.
One would think that it is appropriate to start at the bottom and work your way up through the limits.
As a beginner with little experience the games should be easier to cope with at the lower levels (as people are making so many mistakes). However when I started playing 6 years ago, poker for me was not something to make a career out of and
it was more as an outlet to have fun and gamble. Therefore it was more exciting to gamble for higher stakes and try to win bigger pots. Obviously, I was never really going to beat my more experienced (professional) opponents and so was a net loser in the games ($5/10-25/50 PLO). Whilst I have taken something from this experience (something does rub-off playing against the best),
as the bankroll depleted I had to start from the bottom ($1/2). I think at this level that I started to respect the game more and tried to learn how my opponents think, what their 'leaks' were and how to beat them. Going up the stakes is a process where you also need to learn discipline and bankroll management. I feel you will always know when you are ready to move up one level. In terms of learning about the game, there are so many good sources available for all players at all
limits. Playing lots of hands and discussing interesting situations with your friends is vital to progressing through the game. Nik. Edited by Nik Persaud - 10 Feb 2009 at 6:29pm |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |